Depiction of Sustainable Divergence between the UK and the EU—the Fair Share Principle in Practice

Sustainable Divergence between the UK and the EU—the Fair Share Principle in Practice



As sustainability continues to grow in importance for businesses, regulators are starting to provide guidance on how competition law applies to ‘green agreements’. In our recent article, written alongside Linklaters, we examine how the European Commission and the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) are shaping their frameworks to account for sustainability under Article 101(3) TFEU and the national equivalent.

One of the key differences between the two regulators is how they assess the benefits to consumers. Both agree that consumers must receive a ‘fair share’ of the benefits from green agreements, but the scope of consumers for which sustainability benefits can be considered varies. While the European Commission’s approach remains relatively constrained, allowing only benefits to consumers within the relevant market, the CMA appears to take a broader stance. Under the UK guidelines, collective benefits to consumers outside the immediate market may be considered, potentially allowing agreements that may be blocked under the European Commission’s rules.

In the article, we empirically illustrate this divergence through a hypothetical case study involving an agreement between grocery delivery companies to adopt more sustainable delivery fleets. The analysis reveals how the UK interpretation could permit an agreement that might not be allowed under EU rules. Nevertheless, we explore the possibility that the EU’s regulatory framework, despite its stricter parameters, could still achieve a similar outcome in certain cases. Both jurisdictions offer ’open door’ policies, enabling businesses to seek informal advice from regulators, providing a pathway for green agreements to proceed.

This material was first published by Thomson Reuters, trading as Sweet & Maxwell, 5 Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5AQ, in Rosenboom, N., Moore, D., Ford, J., Cochrane, E. and Cameron, Z. (2024), Sustainable Divergence between the UK and the EU—the Fair Share Principle in Practice, European Competition Law Review 45:9, September, and is reproduced by agreement with the publishers. For further details, please see the publishers’ website.


Download

Related

Articles
14 minute read
Depiction of A fast and low-risk solution to the growth problem?

A fast and low-risk solution to the growth problem?

Small innovative companies face a significant equity shortfall. If this shortfall could be reduced substantially, these companies would materially increase national productivity and growth. But the regulations which contributed to the shortfall are well-founded. Simply reducing or reversing these regulations would likely impose high social costs. The regulations are diverse… Read More

< 1 minute read
Depiction of ESG: does the political shift mean businesses will lose out?

ESG: does the political shift mean businesses will lose out?

Environmental, social and governance (ESG) principles have long been a key factor in Boardroom discussions and decisions. However recent political developments—particularly in the US—have sparked a stark change in direction. Is it all over for ESG, or is there a future? In this episode of Top of the Agenda,… Read More

Back to top