Depiction of Sustainable Divergence between the UK and the EU—the Fair Share Principle in Practice

Sustainable Divergence between the UK and the EU—the Fair Share Principle in Practice



As sustainability continues to grow in importance for businesses, regulators are starting to provide guidance on how competition law applies to ‘green agreements’. In our recent article, written alongside Linklaters, we examine how the European Commission and the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) are shaping their frameworks to account for sustainability under Article 101(3) TFEU and the national equivalent.

One of the key differences between the two regulators is how they assess the benefits to consumers. Both agree that consumers must receive a ‘fair share’ of the benefits from green agreements, but the scope of consumers for which sustainability benefits can be considered varies. While the European Commission’s approach remains relatively constrained, allowing only benefits to consumers within the relevant market, the CMA appears to take a broader stance. Under the UK guidelines, collective benefits to consumers outside the immediate market may be considered, potentially allowing agreements that may be blocked under the European Commission’s rules.

In the article, we empirically illustrate this divergence through a hypothetical case study involving an agreement between grocery delivery companies to adopt more sustainable delivery fleets. The analysis reveals how the UK interpretation could permit an agreement that might not be allowed under EU rules. Nevertheless, we explore the possibility that the EU’s regulatory framework, despite its stricter parameters, could still achieve a similar outcome in certain cases. Both jurisdictions offer ’open door’ policies, enabling businesses to seek informal advice from regulators, providing a pathway for green agreements to proceed.

This material was first published by Thomson Reuters, trading as Sweet & Maxwell, 5 Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5AQ, in Rosenboom, N., Moore, D., Ford, J., Cochrane, E. and Cameron, Z. (2024), Sustainable Divergence between the UK and the EU—the Fair Share Principle in Practice, European Competition Law Review 45:9, September, and is reproduced by agreement with the publishers. For further details, please see the publishers’ website.


Download
Contact

Dr Nicole Rosenboom

Partner
Contributor
Senior Consultant
Related
EXPERTISE

Download
Share

Related

Articles
< 1 minute read
Depiction of Oxera responds to proposed changes to the UK’s competition and regulatory appeals frameworks

Oxera responds to proposed changes to the UK’s competition and regulatory appeals frameworks

In July 2026, the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade (BIST), then known as the Department for Business and Trade (DBT), launched a consultation on proposed reforms aimed at streamlining the UK’s competition redress, enforcement and regulatory appeals arrangements.1 Oxera provides economic advice to clients… Read More

< 1 minute read
Depiction of How should sustainability considerations be reflected in European Merger control?

How should sustainability considerations be reflected in European Merger control?

Against the backdrop of the European Commission’s draft merger guidelines, our latest episode explores how sustainability can be given appropriate weight when assessing mergers. Helen Jenkins is joined by Simon Holmes, a Member of the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal and Visiting Professor in Law at the University of… Read More

Back to top