How can economics help governments decide how to spend scarce public funds?
In the UK, and across Europe, there are many public-funded areas crying out for more investment. However, the context of low growth, high levels of public debt and public interest payments, mean that tough decisions on spending priorities across public services, infrastructure and social security have to be made.
In this episode of Top of the Agenda, Helen Jenkins is joined by Sir Philip Rutnam, Chair of the Council of the National Institute for Economic and Social Research, and former Permanent Secretary at the UK Department for Transport and Home Office, and Andy Meaney, a Partner and Head of Transport at Oxera. Together they discuss how governments can use economic analysis to decide how to spend scarce public funds. How should we allocate funds to health, transport, education or social support? And then once those decisions are made, do we opt for fewer potholes or more bus services; more or better-paid doctors, or more MRI machines?
Listen and subscribe to the Top of the Agenda podcast series on Spotify, Apple or via your favourite podcast platform.
Related
PR24 redetermination: what the CMA’s decision means for UK households and water regulation
In this special edition of Top of the Agenda, we’re diving into the UK water sector to explore the Competition and Markets Authority’s (CMA) final determinations: the PR 24 Redetermination process. In England and Wales, the amount consumers pay for their water is regulated by the Office of Water Regulation… Read More
The reality gap: testing AI from compliance to enforcement
Companies and regulators often operate with distinct immediate objectives, e.g. profit maximisation versus consumer protection. Yet, as artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly permeates the economy, both sides face a shared challenge: navigating the opacity of complex algorithms. For companies, the primary imperative is risk management. A newly deployed algorithm that inadvertently… Read More