Depiction of Which? report—consumer data in online markets

Which? report—consumer data in online markets


David Jevons


Businesses increasingly use consumer data to offer better and more targeted digital products and services. Many of these new business models rely on data to facilitate transactions and generate revenues in a way that was not previously possible, through either targeted advertising or better matching.

Such access to personal data has understandably raised concerns about privacy, and (in the worst cases) the selling and illegal use of data. In certain circumstances, competition in the market can mitigate concerns about privacy, but this depends, crucially, on whether consumers are able to understand the privacy implications of using a particular service and can exercise choice.

The extent to which different firms are able to access similar data is important for competition, and it depends on two key factors—the cost of acquiring data, and the rate at which a piece of data depreciates.

Messaging apps are an example of where competition can bring about good outcomes. The nature of the data has led to consumers exercising choice between messaging apps, and service providers competing on privacy-related features. By contrast, with health and fitness apps, behavioural biases (if combined with a lack of engagement with terms and conditions) can lead to privacy concerns, even when there appears to be competition in the market.




Depiction of To tax or not to tax: will an online sales tax rebalance the retail sector?
9 minute read

To tax or not to tax: will an online sales tax rebalance the retail sector?

The growth of online sales has prompted debate around whether an online sales tax (OST) should be introduced to ‘rebalance’ the taxation of the retail sector. Indeed, the evolution of retailing in the UK has implications for several key government policy areas. We revisit the topic, which we explored in a 2020 Agenda article, in light of the recent launch of an HM Treasury consultation on the introduction of an OST. Read More

Depiction of Intel and the AEC test: ‘Do. Or do not. There is no try.’
8 minute read

Intel and the AEC test: ‘Do. Or do not. There is no try.’

After more than two decades, the Intel saga may have finally ended with the General Court’s judgment of 26 January 2022. The judgment—which had at its core the use of the ‘as-efficient competitor’ test in the context of loyalty rebates―confirms the critical role of robust economic analysis in abuse of dominance cases. We reflect on the implications going forward. Read More