How can economics help governments decide how to spend scarce public funds?
In the UK, and across Europe, there are many public-funded areas crying out for more investment. However, the context of low growth, high levels of public debt and public interest payments, mean that tough decisions on spending priorities across public services, infrastructure and social security have to be made.
In this episode of Top of the Agenda, Helen Jenkins is joined by Sir Philip Rutnam, Chair of the Council of the National Institute for Economic and Social Research, and former Permanent Secretary at the UK Department for Transport and Home Office, and Andy Meaney, a Partner and Head of Transport at Oxera. Together they discuss how governments can use economic analysis to decide how to spend scarce public funds. How should we allocate funds to health, transport, education or social support? And then once those decisions are made, do we opt for fewer potholes or more bus services; more or better-paid doctors, or more MRI machines?
Listen and subscribe to the Top of the Agenda podcast series on Spotify, Apple or via your favourite podcast platform.
Related
Calling time on the approach to performance incentives in water
The approach to incentivising performance in the England and Wales water sector requires substantial reform. The Independent Water Commission (IWC) has recommended rationalisation of the number of performance commitments (PCs) and a dampening of incentive rates.1 For two price reviews in a row, a significant number of… Read More
Valuing the right to operate: an economic perspective on concession disputes
What is the value of the right to operate a regulated asset for a finite period of time? And how should that value account for the power of the state or the regulator to alter its terms? These are questions that often sits at the heart of disputes involving… Read More