Soaps, groceries and app stores: extending merger price-rise analysis
Simple tests based on firms producing a single product have become increasingly popular among competition authorities looking to assess the effect of mergers on prices. In reality, however, firms often produce several related products. Does this introduce any potential biases to these tests? If so, what can be done to mitigate them?
Select ‘Download’ to read the full article.
Related
Podcasts
Behavioural economics: how does decision-making impact business and policy?
Behavioural economics is all around us — from competition rulings, like the Google Search ruling in the US, to EU regulations targeting online dark patterns. It affects how we combat consumer manipulation, design policy, and even understand the behaviour of music fans. In this latest episode, Helen Jenkins is joined… Read More
The reality gap: testing AI from compliance to enforcement
Companies and regulators often operate with distinct immediate objectives, e.g. profit maximisation versus consumer protection). Yet, as artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly permeates the economy, both sides face a shared challenge: navigating the opacity of complex algorithms. For companies, the primary imperative is risk management. A newly deployed algorithm that inadvertently… Read More