Which? report—consumer data in online markets
Businesses increasingly use consumer data to offer better and more targeted digital products and services. Many of these new business models rely on data to facilitate transactions and generate revenues in a way that was not previously possible, through either targeted advertising or better matching.
Such access to personal data has understandably raised concerns about privacy, and (in the worst cases) the selling and illegal use of data. In certain circumstances, competition in the market can mitigate concerns about privacy, but this depends, crucially, on whether consumers are able to understand the privacy implications of using a particular service and can exercise choice.
The extent to which different firms are able to access similar data is important for competition, and it depends on two key factors—the cost of acquiring data, and the rate at which a piece of data depreciates.
Messaging apps are an example of where competition can bring about good outcomes. The nature of the data has led to consumers exercising choice between messaging apps, and service providers competing on privacy-related features. By contrast, with health and fitness apps, behavioural biases (if combined with a lack of engagement with terms and conditions) can lead to privacy concerns, even when there appears to be competition in the market.
Download
Related

The role of regulation in spurring innovation and growth in the EU and the UK
Since the 2008 financial crisis, both the EU and the UK have experienced sustained periods of low growth and weak productivity. The COVID-19 pandemic further exacerbated these trends, and their share of global GDP has continued to decline, especially relative to the US and emerging economies. This has provoked scrutiny… Read More

Reasserting the UK’s FRAND framework: implications of the Court of Appeal’s decision in Optis v Apple
Nearly a decade after establishing the UK’s FRAND framework in Unwired Planet v Huawei (2017), Lord Justice Birss returned in Optis v Apple (2025)—this time in the Court of Appeal—to steer the law back to his original approach.1 That means identifying the closest comparator(s), adjusting the… Read More