Depiction of The Consumer Duty: don’t do more—do differently

The Consumer Duty: don’t do more—do differently



The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has finalised the rules, guidance, and implementation period for the new Consumer Duty.

The FCA’s journey

The Consumer Duty is the product of 15 years of evolution in the regulation of financial services. It’s not so much a change of direction for the FCA, but a change in what is required of firms.

The FCA has developed new tools that have been embedded within its policy and supervisory teams.

  • Behavioural economics enables the FCA to analyse what biases customers are subject to, and how and why customers make decisions in response to the choice architecture presented by firms. As a result, customer behaviour, whether rational or irrational, is now treated as predictable.
  • Data science enables the FCA to quantify the distribution of customer outcomes and locate the clusters of customers who are not enjoying good outcomes. As a result, customer outcomes are now measurable.

Firms can deploy the very same toolkit of behavioural economics and data science to prevent harm from occurring in the first place.

The customer journey

In a world where customer outcomes are both predictable and measurable, the FCA is aiming to change the customer journey experience:

  • with products and services that are genuinely designed to meet the customer’s needs and financial objectives;
  • with pricing that ensures fair value for all customers (not just the ‘average customer’);
  • with communications that succinctly cut through the complexities without resorting to jargon, and which result in genuine customer understanding;
  • with support processes that make it as easy to do something in the customer’s best interest as it is to do something in the firm’s commercial interest (which will be increasingly aligned as customer understanding grows).

No matter how diverse the customer base, how challenging the context, or how complex the product, customers (and the FCA) will come to expect these outcomes as standard.

Your journey

The burden of proof is shifting; providers are now expected to be able to provide the FCA with the evidence that their products consistently deliver good outcomes for customers.

Your firm’s Consumer Duty gap analysis may have revealed a number of areas where actions are required. Indeed, recent surveys suggest that most firms have particular work to do on fair value assessment, effective communication (including sludge audits), and the design of new management information.

The key to implementing the Consumer Duty is not about traditional, box-ticking compliance, but about achieving deeper insight into your customers’ behaviours and outcomes, using both behavioural economics and data science techniques. The Consumer Duty is not about doing more; it’s about doing things differently.


Download

Related

Articles
10 minute read
Depiction of Justice for hire? Opportunities and challenges in third-party litigation funding in competition collective actions

Justice for hire? Opportunities and challenges in third-party litigation funding in competition collective actions

In many jurisdictions, collective actions in competition law have become an important route for consumers and businesses to seek redress. Yet these cases are costly and complex. Third-party litigation funding (TPLF) has emerged as a central mechanism for making them viable. Recent UK experience provides important lessons on the opportunities… Read More

< 1 minute read
Depiction of Should pensions be a source of funding for a country’s investment needs?

Should pensions be a source of funding for a country’s investment needs?

The UK government aims to stimulate economic growth by encouraging more investment in British businesses. One potential source of that investment is pension funds, but would such policies truly serve the long-term interests of savers and/or the short-term needs of the economy? In this episode of Top of the Agenda, Dr… Read More

Back to top