Articles nominated for the 2019 Antitrust Writing Awards

Oxera is delighted to have two Agenda articles nominated for the 2019 Antitrust Writing Awards. The aim of the Antitrust Writing Awards is to promote competition scholarship and to contribute to competition advocacy. The jury contributes to this achievement by selecting the best writings published in 2018.

 

Discover our nominated Oxera articles:

Dr Gunnar Niels, “Funda-mentals of Article 102: A Dominant Platform, but No Abuse”

In March 2018 the Court of Amsterdam issued a verdict in a long-running abuse of dominance case involving funda, the largest property website in the Netherlands. The Court found funda to be dominant, but did not consider the company’s discriminatory listing of rival estate agents to be distortive of competition. Dr Gunnar Niels, Partner at Oxera and court expert in the case, describes how this makes for an interesting comparison with Google Shopping and other competition cases involving online platforms

Did you like the article? Why not vote for it?

 

James Kavanagh, “Four-ever? Competition Remedies in the Audit Market”

In light of recent accounting scandals, there are widespread calls for the UK competition authority to re-examine the audit market. Yet spending a substantial amount of resources on a market investigation, and concluding once again that there is a competition problem, is of little value if a suitable remedy cannot be found. A break-up of the Big Four is perceived by many as a necessary and long-awaited intervention, but is it the right solution? And if not, what would be an alternative remedy?

Did you like the article? Why not vote for it?

 

Agenda, Oxera’s monthly online publication, brings you cutting-edge economics thinking as it applies to business, law and regulation. Sign up here.

Posted 22/01/2019